Straipsnis Kultūra ir lietuvybė strateginėje Lietuvos raidos vizijoje

Literatūra

• „Apie strategiją Lietuva 2030 – nuo rengimo link įgyvendinimo“ [žiūrėta 2013 m. birželio 23 d.].
• Friedman, Jonathan, Cultural Identity and Global Process, London: Sage Publications, 1994.
• Guibernau, Montserat, “Anthony D. Smith on Nations and National Identity: a Critical Assessment,” Nations and Nationalism, 2004, vol. 10, p. 125–141.
• Guisan, Catherine, A Political Theory of Identity in European Integration: Memory and Policies, Oxon, New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Račkauskas, Merkelis, Užrašai: dvidešimt metų (1885–1905) Žemaitijos užkampy, Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas, 2008.
• Rata, Elizabeth, “Late Capitalism and Ethnic Revivalism: A ‘New Middle Age?’” Anthropological Theory, 2003, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–63.
• Risse, Thomas, A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres, Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press, 2010.
• Rubavičius, Vytautas, „Romantikų aplinka ir Wilhelmo von Humboldto komparatyvistinė lingvistinė antropologija“ | Antanas Andrijauskas (sud.), Rytai – Vakarai: komparatyvistinės studijos, t. 1, Vilnius: Vaga, 2002, p. 197–213.
• Rubavičius, Vytautas, Postmodernusis kapitalizmas, Kaunas: Kitos knygos, 2010.
• Smetona, Antanas, Pasakyta parašyta, Kaunas: Spindulys, 1992/1935.
• Smith, Anthony D., “When is Nation?” Geopolitics, 2002, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–32.
• Subačius, Paulius, Antanas Baranauskas: gyvenimo tekstas ir tekstų gyvenimai, Vilnius: Aidai, 2010.
• Wallerstein, Immanuel, World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, 2nd printing, Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.
• Гумбольдт, Вильгельм фон, О различии организмов человеческого языка и о влиянии этого различия на развитие человеческого рода, Санкт-Петербург, 1859.
• Гумбольдт, Вильгельм фон, Язык и философия культуры, Москва: Наука, 1985.

Culture and Being Lithuanian in the Strategic Vision of Lithuanian Development

Summary. How does Lithuanian culture unfold in the national development and strategic political visions? Why has the understanding of the importance of culture has decayed during the years after the regaining of Independence? These questions are considered through the development of a theoretical insight of culture – culture is perceived as a mother tongue based totality of historically developing practical ways of cohabitation with the natural, historical, and neighboring environment, as a visual, symbolic heritage of the material forms and the ways of its use and “raising”. Culture is always locational, whose primal task is to support communal ties, thus social identities. Existential relationships among culture, location and identities are discussed. Also the characteristic features of the system of culture functioning in the environment of globalization and European integration are determined. Relying on theoretical insights and the perception of new cultural trends, the vision of the Lithuania’s progress strategy Lithuania in 2030 is analyzed, extracting its ideological assumptions and “deculturing” nature of the activity. This document is compared to the Estonian one which sets a major strategic development goal of strengthening being Estonian that can only be realized using the means and methods provided by culture.

Keywords: globalization, cohabitation, culture, Lithuanian identity, Lithuania 2030, national identity.