Straipsnis Partinio patronažo konceptualizavimas

Literatūra

• Aceituno-Montes, José Manuel; Antonio Robles-Egea, An Impossible Democracy Political Clientelism and Corruption in Andalusia, ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, 2011.
• Badger, Susan; Melanie Bejzyk, Shawna Christianson, Shari Currie, Tom Monastyrski, Lisa Morawecki, Kelly Render, Tim Waddell (eds.), Lexicon of Terms and Concepts in Public Administration, Public Policy and Political Science, Winnipeg: Osnovy Publishers, 1998.
• Bagdanavičius, Juozas, Viešosios politikos terminų aiškinamasis žodynas, Vilnius: Ciklonas, 2011.
• Bealey, Frank, The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
• Bearfield, Domonic A., “What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination,” Public Administration Review, 2009, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 64–76.
• Bogušinskaitė, Irena; Vitalis Nakrošis, „Lietuvos vyriausybės įstaigų ir įstaigų prie ministerijų vadovų kaita ir politizacija“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 38–67.
• Čeponytė, Eglė, „Lietuvos švietimo įstaigų politizacija: Vilniaus miesto ir Vilniaus rajono savivaldybių lyginamoji analizė“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 123–160.
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz, “The Politics of Patronage and Coalition: How Parties Allocate Managerial Positions in State-Owned Enterprises,” Political Studies, 2014, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 398–417.
• Gajduschek, Gyoergy, “Politicisation, Professionalisation, or Both? Hungary’s Civil Service System,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2007, vol. 40, pp. 343–362.
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna, “Political Competition and the Politicisation of the State in East Central Europe,” Comparative Political Studies, 2003, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1123–1147.
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna, Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
• Gwiazda, Anna, “Party Patronage in Poland: The Democratic Left Alliance and Law and Justice Compared,” East European Politics and Societies, 2008, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 802–827.
• Hellman, Joel S.; Geraint Jones, Daniel Kaufmann, Seize the State, Seize the Day, ABCDE Conference, Washington (D.C.), 2000.
• Hopkin, Jonathan, Conceptualizing Political Clientelism: Political Exchange and Democratic Theory, APSA Annual Meeting Philadelphia, USA, 2006.
• Jankauskas, Algimantas (sud.), Politikos mokslų enciklopedinis žodynas, Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2007.
• Juralavičienė, Jolanta; Edita Galvanauskaitė, „Teoriniai ir praktiniai viešojo administravimo politizacijos aspektai“, Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 2007, nr. 19, p. 98–108.
• Karklins, Rasma, “Typology of Post-Communist Corruption,” Problems of Post-Communism, 2002, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 22–32.
• Kaulakienė, Angelė; ir kt., Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, Vilnius: Alma littera, 2013.
• Kazakevičius, Giedrius, „Lojalumo struktūros įtaka Lietuvos viešojo sektoriaus politizacijai“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 161–197.
• Kopecký, Petr; Gerardo Scherlis, Maria Spirova, “Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage,” Political Concepts, Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, 2008, vol. 25.
• Kopecký, Petr; Maria Spirova, “‘Jobs for the Boys?’ Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe,” West European Politics, 2011, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 897–921.
• Kopecký, Petr; Peter Mair, “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe,” EUI Working Paper RSCAS, 2011, no. 41.
• Kopecký, Petr; Peter Mair, Maria Spirova, Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi, “Patronage and Public Appointments in Iceland,” ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2006.
• Krupavičius, Algis; Alvidas Lukošaitis, Lietuvos politinė sistema: sąranga ir raida, Kaunas: Poligrafija ir informatika, 2004.
• Laurišonytė, Neringa, „Lietuvos valstybės valdomų įmonių vadovų politizacija“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 68–95.
• Likaitė, Dovilė, „Politizuoti(s) ar ne(si)politizuoti? Lietuvos asmens sveikatos priežiūros įstaigų vadovų atvejis“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 96–122.
• MacLean, Iain; Alistair MacMillan (eds.), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, “The Rise of the Partisan State, Parties, Patronage and Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 2006, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 274–297.
• Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik; Tim Veen, “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe,” East European Politics, 2012, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 4–22.
• Mikkelsen, Kim Sass, “In Murky Waters: A Disentangling of Corruption and Related Concepts,” Crime, Law and Social Change, 2013, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 357–374.
• Muller, Wolfgang C., “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State” | Richard S. Katz, William J. Crotty (eds.), Handbook of Party Politics, London: SAGE Publications, 2005, pp. 189–195.
• Nakrošis, Vitalis, „Lietuvos viešojo sektoriaus organizacijų vadovų kaita ir politizacija“, Politologija, 2014, t. 74, nr. 2, p. 3–37.
• Nakrošis, Vitalis; Liutauras Gudžinskas, “Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post-Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach,” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 2012/2013, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89–120.
• Palidauskaitė, Jolanta; Raimondas Ibenskas, „Valstybės užvaldymas Lietuvoje: priežastys ir formos“, Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 2007, nr. 21, p. 61–74.
• Papakostas, Apostolis, “Why is There no Clientelism in Scandinavia? A Comparison of the Swedish and Greek Sequences of Development” | Simona Piattoni (ed.), Clientelism Interests and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 31–53.
• Peters, B. Guy; Jon Pierre, Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control, London: Routledge, 2004.
• Rakucevičius, Romaldas, Politologijos žodynas-žinynas, Vilnius: Žygimantų spaustuvė, 2003.
• Rybář, Marek, “Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 2006, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 320–340.
• Robinson, James A.; Thierry Verdier, “The Political Economy of Clientelism,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2013, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 260–291.
• Roniger, Luis, “Political Clientelism, Democracy and Market Economy,” Comparative Politics, 2004, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 353–375.
• Roper, Steven D., “The Influence of Party Patronage and State Finance on Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from Romania,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 2006, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 362–382.
• Sajo, Andras, “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” East European Constitutional Review, 1998, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 37–42.
• Singer, Matthew M., “Buying Voters with Dirty Money: The Relationship between Clientelism and Corruption,” APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper, 2009.
• Szczerbiak, Aleks, “State Party Funding and Patronage in Post-1989 Poland,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 2006, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 298–319.
• Vaitkevičiūtė, Valerija, Tarptautinių žodžių žodynas, Vilnius: Žodynas, 2007.
• Varraich, Aiysha, “Corruption: An Umbrella Concept,” QoG Working Paper Series, 2014, no. 4, pp. 353–375.
• Volintiru, Clara, “The Exploitative Function of Party Patronage: Does It Serve the Party’s Interest?,” East European Politics, 2015, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–55.
• Weingrod, Alex, “Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1968, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 377–400.

Conceptualizing Party Patronage

Summary. The paper focuses on the conceptualization of party patronage. The analysis of the usage of the term party patronage reveals several challenges: scholars from different fields use different definitions of party patronage, in addition same phenomena can be described by different concepts making it difficult to compare data from different surveys or analysis. Furthermore the term itself must be revised continuously as it can become out dated due to changing aspects of party patronage in modern world. To clarify the usage of term party patronage it is important to define contiguous phenomenon such as clientelism, politicization, state capture, pork barrel and corruption. Hence this paper suggests slightly modified conceptualization used by Kopecky et al.: party patronage as power of political parties to make personnel decisions in the public sector for Lithuanian social sciences. Party patronage is defined by three dimensions: who makes the decision, what are the decisions and where those decisions are made? In case of party patronage political parties acts as collective patrons and they make decisions of the personnel matter (hiring, promoting and transferring of public servants) in public sector. This conceptualization enables to show differences between party patronage and contiguous phenomenon. In short clientelism should be understood as an electoral resource of the political party, while party patronage should be understood as an organizational and governmental resource. Concept of politicization is closely connected to party patronage, however politicization is more suitable for public administrative studies as it is directed to the separation of bureaucrats and politicians while party patronage in political science puts attention on the political power of parties to make personal decisions. State capture is defined as systematic influence of business to government in order to obtain favorable legal and regulatory decisions. Pork barrel politics means direction of funding and legislation towards certain constituency or geographical region. Corruption should be understood as abuse of authority and power for personal gain.

Keywords: party patronage, conceptualization, clientelism, politicization, state capture, pork barrel.